The Cultural Counterrevolution: Understanding Trump’s Assault on the Creative Community
#CreativeFreedomAct #CultureShiftAct #CreativeSocietyAct
The Cultural Counterrevolution: Understanding Trump’s Assault on the Creative Community
When a society begins to fear its artists, it is not the artists who should be afraid.
In the second Trump administration, we are witnessing a methodical rollback of public support for the arts, humanities, and creative freedom. While headline events—like the takeover of the Kennedy Center or the defunding of drag-inclusive theater—have captured attention, they are symptoms of a deeper project: the political capture of culture itself.
This is not just a budgetary maneuver. It is a cultural counterrevolution, cloaked in patriotic language and driven by a hunger to control the stories a society tells about itself.
Let us be clear: this is not simply about performance funding or grant eligibility. It is about the power to narrate reality.
Five Justifications, One Goal: Narrative Control
The Trump administration offers several justifications for its sweeping actions against the creative community, each tailored to resonate with a specific political base. Yet they all converge on a single aim: to discredit and dismantle cultural narratives that deviate from nationalist, traditionalist, and binary values.
1. The War on “Woke”
Trump’s recurring claim is that public institutions have been infiltrated by “radical gender ideology” and “woke propaganda.” Under this banner, federal agencies have scrubbed their websites of references to LGBTQ+ history, racial justice, and even environmental equity.
Grants to community arts groups that center gender-diverse or race-conscious storytelling have been revoked mid-cycle. Artists whose work explores the plural, the ambiguous, or the marginal are recast as cultural saboteurs. The state is redrawing the boundaries of acceptable expression—one canceled exhibit, one censored performance, one erased web archive at a time.
2. Rewriting the National Story
At the heart of this campaign is a longing for a mythic America: simple, righteous, and triumphant. The past must be sanitized, the present must conform.
Through Executive Order 14253, museums and cultural agencies were instructed to remove content deemed “divisive” or “anti-American.” Celebrations of Indigenous resilience, civil rights struggles, queer history, and immigrant contributions have been systematically deprioritized or deleted altogether.
This is not history—it is heritage theater, where complexity is a threat and memory is weaponized.
3. The Budget Ruse
The administration claims to be saving taxpayers money by slashing funding to the NEA, NEH, NPR, and PBS. Yet these institutions represent less than 0.002% of the federal budget. The real target is not cost—it is critique.
Public broadcasting has long served as a space for dialogue, nuance, and cultural experimentation. By gutting its funding, the administration is not balancing the books. It is silencing the soundtrack of civic reflection.
4. “Protecting Children” from Ambiguity
Art that embraces ambiguity—of gender, identity, power, belief—is reframed as a danger to children. The strategy is cynical: cloak censorship in the language of protection.
Children’s theater programs, inclusive books, and school exhibitions have been defunded or targeted for removal. Trump’s culture operatives do not fear indoctrination. They fear liberation—the kind that happens when a young person sees themselves reflected, perhaps for the first time, in a work of art.
5. Balancing the Scales—by Tilting Them
Trump insists that liberal cultural institutions have long suppressed conservative voices. His solution? Install political loyalists as board members, mandate “balanced” programming, and punish institutions that resist.
But what is being called balance is, in truth, a reassertion of dominance. The administration is not seeking conversation. It is enforcing orthodoxy.
Why This Matters Now
We are not only fighting over budgets or bureaucracies. We are contending with a vision of America—one that fears complexity, silences difference, and punishes imagination.
Artists, educators, curators, poets, and performers are among the last defenders of cultural space where truth can be felt, where ambiguity can breathe, and where contradiction can be honored rather than crushed.
When the creative community is pushed to the margins, what follows is not neutrality. It is propaganda.
When the Regime Fears the Poet: A Global History of Authoritarian Attacks on Art—and What Must Be Done Now
Throughout history, authoritarian regimes have feared few things more than a free imagination.
Wherever a tyrant rises, the artists are among the first to be silenced. Why? Because art moves through intuition and vision, through memory and dream. It does not obey the slogans of the moment. It reaches for what is beyond the approved borders of thought.
We are not the first generation to witness this pattern. But we may be the first in a long time to witness its resurgence on so many fronts at once—and to be given the chance to stop it before the doors fully close.
"Degenerate Art": Germany, 1937
In 1937, the Nazi regime staged an exhibition in Munich titled Entartete Kunst—Degenerate Art. It included 650 works confiscated from German museums: paintings by Kandinsky, Klee, Nolde, Chagall, and others whose forms defied the state’s aesthetic of purity and nationalism. Their crime? Abstraction. Dissonance. Jewishness. Humanity.
The exhibit was meant to humiliate, to mock. Crowds poured in, some to jeer, some to mourn. Meanwhile, the regime promoted approved art in a nearby hall: heroic peasants, muscular soldiers, and maternal Aryan women. The message was clear—art must serve the state or perish.
Stalin’s Shadow: Soviet Union, 1930s–1950s
In the USSR, artists were drafted into the ideological army of socialist realism. Poetry became propaganda. Dissent became treason.
Anna Akhmatova's verses were banned. Composer Dmitri Shostakovich lived in fear of midnight knocks. The poet Osip Mandelstam was arrested and exiled for writing a short poem mocking Stalin’s mustache. He died in a transit camp.
And yet, in secret notebooks and whispered salons, the underground currents of resistance flowed.
Latin America’s Poets in Exile
From Argentina to Chile, the 20th century saw poets imprisoned, singers exiled, filmmakers disappeared. After the 1973 Chilean coup, the new regime feared the songs of Víctor Jara more than rifles. He was arrested, tortured, and murdered in a stadium filled with dissidents. His hands were broken so he could no longer play guitar. Still, the people sang his songs.
Mao’s Cultural Revolution
In China, between 1966 and 1976, Mao Zedong launched a campaign to purge “bourgeois” and “feudal” culture. Traditional opera, classical poetry, and foreign literature were destroyed. Writers were sent to rural “reeducation” camps.
Only revolutionary work approved by the Party could be published. The arts became instruments of control. The imagination was labeled counterrevolutionary.
Trumpism and the Soft Authoritarian Turn
Now, in our own time, we are seeing a subtler but no less dangerous version of this authoritarian impulse rise again.
Grants are canceled. Museums are censored. Public broadcasting is defunded. Drag is banned. DEI is labeled subversion. Books are pulled from schools. Histories are erased from websites. Artists are investigated not for breaking laws, but for breaking form.
The signs are all too familiar:
A suspicion of ambiguity.
A hatred of difference.
A desire to freeze the past in a mythic mold.
A deep fear of the artist who speaks to the soul, not the script.
What Must Be Done
We have been here before. And the lessons of history speak clearly.
1. Preserve the Memory
Authoritarian regimes count on forgetfulness. They burn archives, ban books, and erase names. The creative community must become the living archive: publishing, documenting, republishing, preserving dissenting voices, and refusing the myth of a single official truth.
2. Refuse Isolation
Censorship breeds in silence. We must speak out not only when our own work is threatened, but when any creative voice is silenced—especially those most marginalized.
An attack on one artist is an attack on the ecosystem of freedom.
3. Create Parallel Institutions
When the state defunds, we must reimagine. Independent art spaces, alternative media, underground journals, mutual aid for artists—these become vital arteries when official channels are choked.
Resistance requires infrastructure.
4. Practice the Art of Witness
This is not the time to make easy work. We must make work that bears witness, that remembers, that mourns, that subverts, that dreams. Art must carry what the public square cannot yet speak.
Every play canceled, every poem banned, must become ten more, whispered through corridors and stages and screens.
5. Link Hands Across Borders
Authoritarianism is global. So too must be our solidarity. Let poets in Tehran know they are not alone. Let playwrights in Budapest, sculptors in Manila, dancers in Gaza, cartoonists in Istanbul—all feel the pulse of a shared refusal.
Closing
If we allow fear to close the stage, the gallery, the page—we lose not just art, but the future itself.
Because every time the poet is silenced, the tyrant grows louder. But every time the poem is spoken anyway, the tyrant’s power cracks.
History is watching. And more importantly, so are those not yet born. They will ask: What did the artists do, when the world turned dark?
Let our answer be: We tended the flame.
In the name of every silenced poet,
every exiled singer,
every defiant painter,
every invisible dancer—
let the work go on.
The battle for culture is a battle for the future. Not the future imagined by algorithms or flag-wrapped slogans, but the living, tangled, luminous future that art alone can glimpse and reveal.
We are not the margin. We are the root.
The imagination knows no borders. Nor should the resistance.
“Upon the Citizen Rests the Fate of the Nation”
Myself, I am a studio artist and a citizen. My job and my duty is to start the conversation and seed the imagination. It is up to others in the right places to nurture it into a reality. We all have a part to play. What’s your part? Do it.
Hashtags to use: #CreativeFreedomAct #CultureShiftAct #CreativeSocietyAct
web address: https://www.touchonian.com/s/creative-freedom-act
Hi. I did respond to your serendipitous reply. I just wanted to let you know that teaching an after school arts program is really cool. I think if there are people who are very passionate about the outcomes they desire, and you are, you will somehow be led in a direction that honors that, or leads you into a different direction, likely to be better. I am not surprised and I think you will really enjoy it. Just keep in mind, kids are really hungry after school. LOL
I've been thinking, since I read your post, about how much time has gone by since people in this day and age really have not been introduced to "real" art, especially since the slick digital stuff has gotten everyone's attention.
Artists themselves seem to be somewhat reclusive or cluster around their own people. I thought to myself, what would be really cool is if there were constant arts events happening all the time, everywhere. The idea of roving artists came to mind, so I looked it up on Google and that is a thing. Here is the website: https://enhancentertainment.com.au/blog/roving-entertainment-101-how-to-get-wow-right-now/ This is a place in Australia that has a concept for bringing artistry to events. This website mainly features performing artists, but there is no reason there couldn't be visual artists expressing their art and skills and have people watch artists' visions' unfold in front of them, even if it isn't completed at that event. It would be astounding for the laypeople to actually see artists at work.
Or what about an Art Street open to the public. Where visual artists could demonstrate their projects in store windows up and down the street. Performing artists can sing or dance in the streets. We are all looking for the opportunity to show WHY it is so important. It should be like a public cabaret with lay people, townspeople, showing and sharing their joy and beauty openly with all. There could be all kinds of venues for this kind of Roving Arts demonstrations. Maybe even a Roving Arts Celebration that crosses this country coast to coast.
The point is, the Arts are not appreciated if they are never demonstrated, a mingling of minds, between artists and non-artists. It is usually done at upscale events or Universities to small audiences. It should be part of the social atmosphere of communities.
I know the history of Opera began as groups of roving minstrels known as street people. The Operatic vocal technique was developed because the singers could only perform in the streets and people couldn't hear them. The stories were the soap operas of the days prior to electronics. The lucky ones might get paid by the wealthy, kings, politicians, to be in-house entertainment systems for those with status, or unpaid artists getting apprenticeships. It was for entertaining the towns people.
It needs to be seen or heard as sharing the beauty of the Arts. Laypeople need to be reintroduced to the arts in a joyful and relevant way. I think that if even nothing more than donations from delighted people, it could bring in a living, give artists a place to practice their art and sharing the making as well as the finished products.
It might be wishful thinking on my part, but boy, I would love to live in this world joyfully rather than in the destructive "plague" of power mongers and egotistical maniacs. I don't know how else to make sense of this, but our talents are made to be expressed and shared with others, not mostly owned by those who use it for status rather than beauty.